OUTSTANDING HIGH-PRIORITY ISSUE: Use of OpenSea is looking questionable. Maybe their testnet has been broken for roughly 2 days, but their testnet just does not seem to want to load images. If their testnet doesn't work; why should we assume their live system will? Is an alternative to OpenSea an option? Once I recover from frustration (see below), I may finally install Discord and get on their channel or do something along those lines, but I already consider this a big problem.
Whitelist and freelist with time restrictions and minting limits appear to work. Metadata is working fine as I further document below, so I am running out of reasons to think the OpenSea issues are my fault.
At this rate, I may stop for at least a day or two. I am very, very frustrated with OpenSea.
Go to my latest contract and run the tokenURI function by individual entering numbers 1 - 4, as 4 different clicks. I am almost certain this does not require test ETH gas. The metadata in the sense of the JSON file will show up like this: https://kwynn.com/t/22/04/eth/mds/4 . Clicking the "image" url should bring up an image. OpenSea is reading the images:
127.0.0.1 - - [30/Apr/2022:17:39:56 -0400] 157986 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/mds.php?tokenId=4 HTTP/1.1" 200 147 "-" "got/9.6.0 (https://github.com/sindresorhus/got)" 178... - - [30/Apr/2022:17:39:56 -0400] 151888 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/4 HTTP/1.1" 200 147 "-" "got/9.6.0 (https://github.com/sindresorhus/got)" 127.0.0.1 - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:26 -0400] 602931 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/mds.php?tokenId=4 HTTP/1.1" 200 147 "-" "python-requests/2.25.1" 2600:1900... - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:26 -0400] 596539 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/4 HTTP/1.1" 200 147 "-" "python-requests/2.25.1" 2600:1900... - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:32 -0400] 480598 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/4.png HTTP/1.1" 200 5460 "-" "python-requests/2.25.1" 127.0.0.1 - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:34 -0400] 175622 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/mds.php?tokenId=4 HTTP/1.1" 200 147 "-" "okhttp/4.9.3" 35... - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:34 -0400] 171515 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/4 HTTP/1.1" 200 147 "-" "okhttp/4.9.3" 54... - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:35 -0400] 058916 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/4.png HTTP/1.1" 200 5460 "-" "okhttp/4.9.3" 127.0.0.1 - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:41 -0400] 948638 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/mds.php?tokenId=4 HTTP/1.1" 200 147 "-" "axios/0.24.0" 54... - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:41 -0400] 944524 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/4 HTTP/1.1" 200 147 "-" "axios/0.24.0" 54... - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:42 -0400] 187538 "HEAD /t/22/04/eth/mds/4.png HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "axios/0.24.0" 54... - - [30/Apr/2022:17:40:42 -0400] 198125 "GET /t/22/04/eth/mds/4.png HTTP/1.1" 200 5460 "-" "axios/0.24.0"
I have specific reason to believe that the "python requests" are OpenSea. Then it seems lots of other people start reading it. There are more already, and I'm writing this at 18:06. For the moment, I'm pretty much out of ideas on what more to try.
Then look at OpenSea at my contract. Even if you click on the individual images, it just will not show the *($@(!! image.
The loopback address (127.0.0.1) is where I use a proxy "trick" to rewrite and keep the same URL from the user's perspective. The rewrite request is done internally and then handed to the external user. Although I had already confirmed that OpenSea was following 302 redirects and retrieving the image just fine.
I've only been using one address ( 0x9BEb87E50Dbb3f1356C9B8d72A5F08C794d3b95f ) on the Rinkeby Ether testnet. My code is in GitHub. Most of the contracts are verified on Etherscan, meaning you can read the code there, too.
I may add more commentary later, but I should post this for now.