IN THE STATE COURT OF TO-BE-X COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
BIG EVIL BANK
Plaintiff
v.
JEQUANDA UNIQUGA
Defendant
)
)
Civil Action # ABCD-EFG-X
ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
My name is Jequandq Uniquga, and, to the best of my understanding, I am representing the artificial entity all-capital-letters
JEQUANDA UNIQUGA. The defendant will use the term "public corporation" or "entity" JEQUANDA UNIQUGA.
In summary, the defendant DENIES all claims of the plaintiff.
In specific response, the defendant will begin higher up the page than the points of the plaintiff's complaint.
- The defendant asks / demands that the plaintiff prove that BIG EVIL BANK has standing with the court. Or, the defendant denies / challenges that the plaintiff has standing.
For one, the defendant is unclear whether the entity registered with the Secretary of State of Georgia is the same entity that is suing JEQUANDA UNIQUGA, and demand that the plaintiff prove that.
- Answering point 1 at the very top of the COMPLAINT: The defendant questions / denies that the court has jurisdiction over this JEQUANDA UNIQUGA entity. As the defendant will detail below,
the JEQUANDA UNIQUGA entity is an artificial creation / trust of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION. The so-called laws creating this
entity are part of the plaintiff's owners' scheme of counterfeiting, fraud, deception,unconscionable (supposed) contracts, filthy-dirty hands, Satanic practices, etc.
- Also answering point 1 at the very top of the COMPLAINT: The defendant denies that this entity is resident in the court's jurisdiction or anywhere else.
The nature of this entity appears to be a complex matter to decide upon.
- Answering point 2 at the very top and "Breach of Contract" point 5: Presumably the plaintiff is claiming a dollar amount of damages. Neither the plaintiff bank nor any other bank has dealt in lawful dollars for
decades. The US Constitution Article I Section 10: "No State shall ... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts..."
In the course of this matter, the plaintiff has never dealt with anything except accounting entries based on the credit
of JEQUANDA UNIQUGA, which they fraudulently claim are denominated in dollars. (Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars.)
- Answering "Breach of Contract" point 2 - 4: Defendant claims that the plaintiff's exhibits lack sufficient evidence of legitimacy and authenticity.
- An examination of the plaintiff's accounting will likely show that the plaintiff is at a minimum "double dipping." That is, with
each transaction, the plaintiff created an asset entry based on the credit of JEQUANDA UNIQUGA.
Thus, the plaintiff has never lost units of account and is falsely claiming damages.
- The plaintiff also charged transaction fees
- The plaintiff has
collected interest from the defendant. This interest came from labor, blood, sweat, and tears, not accounting entries. This may be considered as
damages to the defendant, and the defendant reserves all rights to seek remuneration for damages independent of this case.
- Answering Breach of Contract Point 5: According to the plaintiff's own "Exhibit B," the account of JEQUANDA UNIQUGA shows a zero balance. The plaintiff's claims are contradictory and possibly fraudulent (possibly another example of double dipping as stated above).
Exhibit B is an "Account Summary" under a Discover Card logo dated 3/12/2024 - 3/31/2024.
- Defendant claims that Exhibit B is evidence of the plaintiff invoking the Emergency Banking Relief Act of March 9, 1933, which has never been repealed, making the UNITED STATES CORPORATION liable for paying all (alleged) debts. This is the only remedy possible given that lawful dollars of gold and silver
were removed from circulation. Thus, this suit may be an attempt at triple dipping, which could be perceived as an offense in the eyes of the Court.
The defendant hopes that this court will take appropriate action against such activities and dismiss this claim / case.
Clean Hands Doctrine
The defendant would like to make more general points going to the "clean hands doctrine." The banking industry's owners have the filthiest
hands possible. 99.99999% of all so-called money was created from a debt with interest. Therefore, the total debt will always exceed the so-called
money in circulation. Thus, the total debt is mathematically unpayable.
The banking system is receiving labor, blood, sweat, and tears in exchange for account entries.
This is slavery (peonage) and worse than slavery.
The owners of the banking industry can and do manipulate media, academia, government, and every other institution in order to hide this fact. These debt so-called contracts are perfect examples of deceptive and unconscionable contracts.
Inflation is largely the "money" system trying to pay an unpayable debt. Inflation is an additional drain on labor.
This system is worse than slavery in that it is demoralizing to all of humanity, especially the defendant.
It's core principle could be considered Satanic or Luciferian, the goal of which is to entice humanity
to expend their life, blood, and energy in servitude to their system. The self-appointed elite who conceived of and promulgate
this system want everyone on earth to work themselves to a long, slow death trying to pay an unpayable debt.
They pretend that we consent through deceptive contracts. They design education and media to insure our ignorance of money and
everything else of importance.
"Those seeking equity must do equity." The banking industry is as evil and non-equitable as one can get.
WHEREFORE, this Answering Defendant prays that this Honorable Court will:
- Dismiss the Complaint with prejudice or grant Plaintiff a reduced amount based
upon the admissions, denials and affirmative defenses, if any, as alleged above herein;
- 2. Award Defendant(s) costs; and
- 3. Award Defendant(s) such other relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
DATED this ___ day of November, 2021, Anno Domini.